Independent Consumer Product · Wellness

A Place of Calm

A wellness product designed for moments when people feel overwhelmed, mentally exhausted, or unable to express what they are feeling.

Defined, built, tested, and launched end to end · Live product

Role

Product strategy, design, and build

What I Owned

Product opportunity, calm over clinical principle, feature prioritization, design, build, qualitative testing, and launch

Status

Live product

The Product Shifts With Time

Evening: a softer, darker greeting · Morning: a low-pressure entry with four paths

View live product

I independently defined the product opportunity, established the principle that the experience should feel calm rather than clinical, prioritized the initial feature set, built the live product, and used qualitative testing to simplify the experience and remove interactions that increased cognitive load.

Product type

Consumer wellness product

Timeline

Summer 2026

Primary users

People experiencing everyday stress or overwhelm

Looking for enterprise and clinical product work?

Explore Schema Designer

The Problem

Why wellness apps add pressure

Many wellness products ask users to immediately identify what they are feeling, explain why, or choose from a large set of tools. That can create more work at the exact moment someone already feels mentally overloaded.

The product opportunity was to create a lower pressure entry into reflection and calming activities, including paths that do not require users to explain themselves.

Product Discovery

How I defined the product direction

Roadmap and Prioritization

Prioritized a low pressure entry, breathing, reflection, and journaling. The conversational chatbot was deprioritized and removed after testing showed it added cognitive load.

Constraints

Independent product with no clinical claim, built for moments when users have low capacity for effort or decisions.

Target User

People experiencing everyday stress or overwhelm who need a lower pressure way to engage with wellness.

Hypothesis

If the entry required less effort and explanation, users would engage during overwhelm rather than abandon the product.

Central Pivot

The product shifted from a guided, conversational experience to a calm, low pressure one once testing showed conversation increased load rather than reducing it.

Research & Validation

What I believed, what I tested, and what changed

My Hypotheses

  • 01Users who feel overwhelmed need a low-pressure entry point, not a questionnaire asking them to articulate what they feel.
  • 02Reducing text and choices lowers the emotional barrier to engagement.
  • 03Personalized insights should support reflection after users create entries without becoming the primary interaction.

Testing & Validation

Who Was Tested

6 users who self-identified as experiencing stress, overwhelm, or anxiety.

Method

Open-ended exploration of the product followed by semi-structured interviews about the emotional experience of using it.

What I Learned

  • Users who felt overwhelmed skipped text-heavy check-ins and went directly to breathing or the Quiet Room.
  • The Quiet Room (visual cues instead of text input) was the most appreciated feature. Users said it felt like "permission to not explain."
  • Some users found the word "patterns" in the insights section slightly clinical.
  • The growth garden created a reason to return, but only when discovered organically; promoting it early felt like pressure.

What Failed & What Changed

What Failed

Originally had a detailed emotion selector with 12+ options; it added pressure at the wrong moment.

What Changed

Replaced with a simple choose-your-path entry with four clear options.

What Failed

Used the word "patterns" in the insights section, which users found slightly clinical.

What Changed

Changed to "themes" and softened the reflective language throughout.

What Failed

Originally featured the growth garden prominently on the home screen; it felt like a task to complete.

What Changed

Moved it to a subtler position so users discovered it through reflection rather than direction.

What Failed

Initially included a chatbot-style AI interface. Users found conversational AI added cognitive load rather than reducing it.

What Changed

Removed the chat interface entirely. Replaced with ambient, non-conversational AI that surfaces insights passively.

Product Decisions

The decisions that shaped the experience

01

Creating a low pressure entry point

User Need

Users feeling overwhelmed needed a way into the product that did not require explaining their emotions first.

Decision

Designed a lightweight daily check-in that lets users enter with minimal effort and choose how deeply to engage.

Tradeoff

Less structure up front meant less immediate personalization, but lowered the barrier to start.

What Changed After Testing

Users who felt overwhelmed skipped text heavy check ins and went directly to breathing or the Quiet Room. This supported maintaining a lower pressure entry with multiple optional paths.

02

Removing conversational AI and keeping insights in the background

User Need

Users needed support without an interaction that added cognitive load during overwhelm.

Decision

Removed the chatbot and kept personalized insights as a quiet layer that surfaces recurring themes only after users create entries.

Tradeoff

Lost an interactive assistive surface, but removed a source of pressure during the most fragile moments.

What Changed After Testing

Testing showed that conversational AI increased cognitive load, so I removed the chatbot and limited AI to generating personalized insights after users created check ins or journal entries.

03

Turning reflection into gradual, visible growth

User Need

Users needed a sense of progress without gratitude feeling like another task to complete.

Decision

Designed gratitude trees as a visual representation of repeated reflection that grows gradually over time.

Tradeoff

Slower visible reward than streaks, but framed reflection as growth rather than obligation.

What Changed After Testing

Users responded positively to the gradual visual representation of reflection, but featuring the Growth Garden too prominently made it feel like a task. It was moved to a subtler position so users could discover it organically.

Safety & Trust

Designing responsibly around emotion

01

Not a clinical product

This is an independent prototype, not a clinical product. It makes no clinical claims and is not a substitute for professional support.

02

Production privacy requirements

A production version would require clear consent, secure storage, transparent data retention controls, and the ability for users to edit or delete their personal entries. Any use of entries to generate personalized insights would need to be explained clearly.

03

Reflective rather than diagnostic

Insights use reflective language, surfacing themes rather than labels. The product never names conditions or implies a diagnosis.

04

Personalized insights, not conversation

Personalized insights surface recurring themes across entries after users create them. They are not therapy, diagnosis, or advice, and the product never initiates conversation.

05

Crisis signposting

A production version would need crisis detection and clear signposting to professional support. That work is out of scope for this prototype and a known limitation.

Delivery

From Product Principle to Live Experience

I independently moved the product from initial concept to live launch. I established the calm over clinical product principle, defined the feature set, built the working experience, conducted qualitative testing, and revised or removed features when they created pressure rather than reducing it.

01

Conception

Defined the vision and emotional direction from scratch, establishing the principle that the product should feel calm rather than clinical.

02

Design

Structured the full experience: check-ins, breathing, journaling, gratitude, insights, and a quiet room for users who cannot find the words.

03

Build

Built the working product with time-aware environments, personalized reflection and insights, and a visual direction rooted in nature and softness.

Product Walkthrough

The product in motion

01

Following a rhythm

Breathing exercises organized by emotional need, not just technique. The interface stays calm even during active breathing.

Breathe

In motion: breathing by emotional need

Full view: Bloom Breath and moment-based options

02

A quieter space

For users who can't find the words, the Quiet Room offers visual and emotional cues instead of text input.

The Quiet Room

The orb: step in when words feel like too much

Full view: no words needed, just presence

03

Reflection becomes growth

Gratitude becomes visible growth through a tree that fills over time, turning reflection into something gradual and living.

Growth Garden

In motion: the tree fills over time

Full view: what your tree can hold

04

Your sanctuary

This section lets people explore different meditative practices morning, meditation, sleep, and world sounds. Each choice takes them to an immersive meditation space shaped by what they selected.

Sanctuary

The constellation of practices

Full view: rest, drift, and soften

05

A space to put it down

The Journal offers a soft daily check-in alongside gentle writing modes (release, reflect, reframe, remember, and unsent letters) for moments that don't fit a category.

Journal: Check in, release, reflect
06

Themes over time

Personalized insights surface recurring themes across check ins and journal entries using reflective rather than diagnostic language.

Personalized Insights

Insights: Themes over time, reflective not diagnostic

Theme Detail: Exploring this theme with care

Validation, Limitations, and Next Steps

Chatbot removed

Testing showed conversational AI added cognitive load

12+ → 4

Emotion selector simplified to a four-path entry

6 sessions

Qualitative testing sessions shaped the product direction

A lower pressure wellness experience, validated through qualitative testing and iteration.

These results reflect qualitative testing and iteration, not clinical effectiveness. The product does not claim to improve or treat a health condition.

What I Would Measure Next

  • 01Whether users return during later moments of overwhelm, not only the first.
  • 02Which entry path, check-in, breathing, or journaling, leads to deeper engagement.
  • 03Whether removing the chatbot reduced drop-off at the start of the experience.
  • 04Self-reported state change without claiming clinical effectiveness.
Schema Designer

Next Project

A visual authoring tool for clinical trial structures

Schema Designer